As I ponder my current dire circumstances, certain ironies and hypocrisies associated with my condition rear their ugly heads. Without revealing too much, I can convey to my readership that I am currently being prosecuted pursuant to an initiative which has been in the works for many months and possibly even years. As proof of that supposition, I offer part of the prosecution discovery package which cites an email I sent in April of 2015.
And what that means is the District Attorney under whose watch this case commenced is one ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN. Mr. Schneiderman is no longer our state’s DA because he recently resigned after it was alleged by no fewer than 3 of his previous girlfriends that during the act of sexual intercourse, he spit in their faces and in one case, told a dark-skinned Indian girlfriend that she was his “brown slave.”
Granted, these are not illegal acts. But personally, I find them disgusting and depraved. In my case, I stand accused of promoting prostitution within an organization which coerced nobody to participate. Simply put in the vernacular, guys wanted to buy it…and girls wanted to sell it. And nobody was conscripted therein. There are no charges concerning coercion or trafficking leveled on any of the 7 conspirators. Let’s say for the sake of argument that I actually did promote prostitution. What’s worse in the eyes of decency? Putting willing and enthusiastic buyers together with similar-minded sellers…or degrading a woman in what I view as a most repulsive fashion? I leave the reader to make his or her own personal judgement.
Moving on…there is a certain individual who has ranted ad nauseum about the organization accused – and me personally – on a site called tnaboard.com. His assumptions and claims about me are in error and overstated. As I sat in front of the judge last week, the DA ran a list of what the State thinks my role in the conspiracy was. That laundry list read virtually chapter and verse directly from all the accusations this tna member has listed, leading me to conclude that this individual is either a direct source for the State – or that the State is reading that site to garner information pursuant to this initiative.
The genesis of this man’s ire has been debated on the site by its members. Personally, I don’t need to debate it because I know where the issue lies. And here it is: This client was such a regular customer at the accused establishment that he became friendly with one of the owners and negotiated a deal wherein he would receive a 50% discount when partaking of their services in exchange for writing reviews of his experiences on a site called theeroticreview.com. At some point in this arrangement, his sense of entitlement led him to make some sort of implied threat the content of which I don’t honestly know. But the person to whom he made this threat one-upped him and the customer was summarily 86’d from the establishment. It was then that he began his crusade to pay them and anybody in their favor (especially me) back.
Regardless, it wouldn’t take an overly shrewd DA to prosecute this man for the misdemeanor of purchasing sex, and the felony of promoting prostitution. Yet he remains unaccused of any offenses when I know he is clearly guiltier than I am under the statutes.
Well…what are ya gonna do? Oh yeah, reveal these hypocrisies and ironies for my readership and hope that somebody notices and rallies to my defense. Fat chance of that, right? Still, it’s worth a shot and makes me feel better to ventilate.